Im grateful observe eHarmony responding within their official web log to a write-up named “Marriage-Maker Claims tend to be Tied in Knots ” from the Wall Street log. The WSJ article examines many of the marriage research launched by internet dating sites like eHarmony along with the strategy familiar with assess these research. We talked a little about any of it subject at the same time, fourteen days ago whenever original WSJ post had been printed (see Story).
The WSJ post failed to turn to kindly from the statistics released by dating sites, and for the most component we buy into the author. The public needs to know how these data are created. Of all of the adult hookup site dating sites mentioned inside the WSJ post, “eHarmony stands apart as one of the more careful ones”. That isn’t exactly a glowing report for eHarmony therefore, they decided to upload an answer on their web log.
In eHarmony blog post each goes into more precisely how they calculated that their unique dating internet site ended up being accountable for 2% of marriages in america, from the 12-month duration closing March 2007. Almost all of the info we currently knew about from a previously introduced PDF document titled “eHarmony | Harris involved 2007 Marriage Metrics amount of eHarmony Marriages” (see tale), nevertheless post does cleanse some more details. Exactly what this blog post does program is, eHarmony is wanting become as open and transparent using their analysis conclusions as you are able to. I believe the name “Open correspondence” may without a doubt end up being a good solution your recognized eHarmony blog.
This is actually the complete eHarmony reaction to the Wall Street diary precisely how they calculate their own matrimony research. For additional information on this dating website, browse the writeup on eHarmony.